My thoughts on... Abortions

Just sat and watched Panorama on abortions.


Women should be allowed to abort their unborn child, if the pregnancy has come from rape, abuse, or they simply can't afford to bring the child up. There are far too many unwanted children on the planet already, and people constantly go on about the amount of people on benefits, so surely unwanted children or children born into poor families will just soak up even more benefits? If these women don't want to have these children, they should be allowed to abort them without fear of reprisal!

If these women constantly keep getting pregnant and having abortions, they should be made to have a temporary pregnancy control device fitted, such as the coil etc, to stop them getting pregnant until such a time as they feel ready to have kids.

Rant over!

My thoughts on... Derren Brown

I don't care what anybody says, Derren Brown is amazing!

It's obvious he can read minds and manipulate thoughts and behaviours, so this staged stunts (to someone like me with a brain) are pretty easy to figure out.

But his one off stunts, like the lottery thing, the airplane stunt, and the one I just watched about the heist, etc, even though it's mind control, are just totally amazing and stunning. What the man can do with someone's mind is bloody scary. I think my brain is far too clever to be able to be manipulated by him, but for those who can be manipulated by people like Derren, I think you're bloody lucky.

Derren is a genius of our age, a bloody marvel, and anyone who thinks otherwise doesn't have a bloody clue what you're talking about, he's a genius!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derren_Brown

Why are people so fickle?

It astounds me how fickle the public are! One minute they like someone, a celebrity for instance, and the next they don't, or one minute they don't like them, then they do! People seem to change their opinions about people so bloody quickly these days, it really surprises me, and makes me laugh!

For instance, Michael Jackson!



People loved him in the 80s, then hated him in the 90s when the first Paedophilia thing came out the first time around. Then he paid them off out of court, reinvented himself, and people loved him again. Then in the 00s they hated him again, when the second Paedophilia thing came out. Then he was found not-guilty, and then he died, and everyone loved him again!

Jade Goody!
 

Everyone hated her when she was in Big Brother in the early 00s. Then they loved her after BB and she started earning a shit load of money, got married, had kids, etc. Then they hated her again when she went on Celebrity Big Brother and was racist to Shilpa Shetty on the show, and bullied her. Then she went to India to try and make things right on their Big Brother show, trying to rebuild relations. Then she got cancer, and she died! Then everyone loved her again!

My third example is Katie Price aka Jordan!



Everyone liked her when she first it the screens, and as her life has evolved, she's been liked one minute and hated the next. When her son Harvey was born with septo-optic dysplasia, everyone felt sorry for her and loved her again, but then when she married Peter Andre and we saw on one of her TV shows how she treated him and what a bitch she was towards him, everyone hated her again. Then when they split and divorced, everyone hated her more. Then she met and married Alex Reid, and people warmed to him on Celebrity Big Brother, people started liking her again, but now she's hated again because of the stories we hear of how she controls Alex and his life etc.

It just goes on. You love them, you hate them, you love them again, then you hate them again. It never ends!
This is what I mean about the public being so fickle. Drives me mad! Why can't people just make up their mind and stick with it?

I love Michael Jackson's music, but don't like him!
I have never liked, nor ever will like Jade Goody!
I have never like, nor ever will like Jordan!

At least I know how I feel about certain people, and my opinions have never changed no matter what's happening in their life! Can others say the same thing? I doubt it!

My Thoughts On... Caster Semenya

I learned today, about a young lady, who, quite fair and squarely, won the 800 Metre race at the World Athletics Championships the other day, winning gold for her Country, South Africa, and then for the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) board to question her gender, because she looks manly, and has a high male hormone count.

I have to say, I am furious by this!

Just because she looks manly, is no reason to suddenly question her winning gold!

She would have had to go through trials to get to the Championships, and would have gone through a number of tests and medicals, and nothing was mentioned prior to her winning the race. Yet as soon as she wins, then all of a sudden the suspicians come flying out of the woodwork!

I bet you if she hadn't have won, none of this would have come up!

I think they're just jealous, cause she stormed the race, and beat the other athletes by a good 2 seconds.

So what if she looks bloody manly! How many women out there, athletes, look manly, yet never get questioned?



Yes she has a high male hormone count, but there could be a genuine medical reason for that.

It could also be, that maybe she has both sets of genitals, male and female, commonly known as an Hermaphrodite.

Or she may not have been born with no genitals whatsoever, known as Intersexual.

Whatever the reason for it, I truly hope that she has at least 51% female hormones, so she can stick her finger up at those genderphobic bastards on the board and say 'yes, i'm a woman, and I won the race fair and square, now leave me the fuck alone!'

For the full story, click HERE

My Thoughts On... Paul Burrell and his secret

A few weeks ago, there was a television programme on Channel 4, entitled 'Paul Burrell - What Really Happened'. This programme brought forward certain questions regarding Paul Burrell, and The Royal Family.

As most people know, Paul Burrell was Princess Diana's butler.

At the inquest regarding Diana's death, it came to light by The Sun Newspaper, that Burrell knew more than he was letting on, but refused to say what it was that he knew.

Paul Burrell - Diana Inquest - The Sun News Story

He lied at the hearing, he held information back, but what was the information in relation to?
Was it about Diana's death? Was it secrets about The Royal Family?

I'm writing this entry, to pose these questions, and to collate my own thoughts on the subject, which, I have to say, after watching that documentary, has fascinated me.

First of all, I think it's blatantly clear that Burrell is gay! He refuses to admit this, God only knows why! When I saw him on 'I'm a celebrity' a few years ago, it was so obvious, but yet he still insistent he was straight!

During the programme, we were introduced to one of his ex partners, a guy called Greg Pead.

Greg had numerous love letters, which were written to him by Burrell, over their 3 year relationship, telling him how much Burrell loved him, and wanted to marry him, etc. These were shown on camera, in Burrell's handwriting. Yet still, Burrell states he's straight, and not only that, that he doesn't even know Greg.

During this relationship, an incident happened on the Royal Yacht Britannia, in March 1981, where there was a gay orgy, involving 11 men, and because of it, Burrell feared he would be sacked.

Why? Was he involved? Why else would he have feared being sacked if he wasn't involved in this gay orgy?

The Queen decided though, and reinstated him, saving him from being sacked. Why? He was just one of the crew, one of the staff, he wasn't even Diana's butler at this point, so why was he so important? What did he know? What did he have over The Queen, to persuade her, that only he, but not the rest of the men, should remain on her staff?

Then Burrell got married to a woman called Maria. Why? Is he bi? I doubt it. After the incident on the Britannia, maybe he decided to start up a relationship with a woman, to cover up his true sexuality?!

Yes, he had two boys by Maria, but then how many men have relationships with women, and kids, to hide their true sexuality? Too many! Is he really that ashamed of his sexuality? He seriously needs to just come out of the closet once and for all! He is a sorry excuse for a man, by hiding his truth. Does the guy ever tell the truth about anything?

Anyway, moving on...

So then he stole 342 items from Diana, after she passed away. Why? What was in that lot, that was so important to hold onto?

Then he went on trial, to fight against potentially being sent down for theft.

3 week's prior to the trial date, Burrell got an agent. Why? What was on his mind, that made him believe he'd get off, and need an agent to help him with his busy schedule once he had got off, ie television interviews, newspaper and magazine deals, book deals, etc?

What did he have, what did he know, that made him believe he'd get off?

Then suddenly, on the last day of the trial, The Queen suddenly remembers a conversation she had with Burrell a few years earlier, and turns up to state that he was given permission to take the goods, and he shouldn't be sent down.

What did he have on The Queen, and/or the Royal Family, that he could use to secure his safe passage away from prison?

It came about, that within the contents of the 342 items Burrell had taken, belonging to Diana, was a tape of a conversation Diana had had, with another long standing member of the Royal staff, a butler called George Smith.

George Smith claimed in 1989, that he was raped by a male member of the Royal Family. He never reported it, because he was scared of losing his job. He got so depressed by what had happened, that he ended up in the Priory Hospital.

Years later, Diana turned up at the hospital, and interviewed George, hence making the tape.
Diana apparently told Burrell about the tape.

Do dots start forming into patterns here?

1. Burrell is gay

2. Burrell was involved in the gay orgy incident on the Royal Yacht Britannia

3. Burrell knew who else was involved in that incident

4. The Queen knew that Burrell knew this information, so Burrell could use his knowledge to his advantage

5. The Queen let him keep his job, after the Britannia incident, for fear this information would be released by Burrell, causing shame and humiliation onto The Royal Family

6. When Burrell was up against the courts over the items taken from Diana's home, yet again The Queen stepped in at the last minute, and allowed him to go free

Is this all because Burrell has something HUGE on The Royal Family, ie that a male member of the Royal Family is gay, and he knows who it is, so the only way The Queen can be assured for certain that her family is safe from the humiliation of this information ever being released, is to keep Burrell safe and well, and financially secure, so that he doesn't ever feel the need to use this information? Ie blackmail against The Royal Family?

What other conclusions can be made from all this information?

Even if he doesn't have the tape, he still has the knowledge, but without the tape, his information could be excused as 'he said/she said' stuff. This is why the tape is vitally important to Burrell, because without it, he doesn't have much of a leg to stand on, especially after George Smith passes away.

And how many tapes are there? Has he copied it numerous times, and given it to numerous people, in a sort of 'if I should die, send this tape to so and so' security blanket? And how many people has he told his secret to?

Because of the Sun Newspaper story and evidence, relating to his secret, and not telling the court the whole truth, he had to leave England, and move to America.

Was this The Queen's doing? Get him out of the Country, pay him off, make him move to America, get him away from us?

Will we ever truly know this secret? Possibly not, but we'll always be guessing. Or maybe we already know, but like Burrell's sexuality, what we know may never actually be confirmed!

Scandal Engulfs The Royals - Really interesting news story about a lot of what i've talked about above!

My thoughts on... Life on other planets, and where did we come from?

This entry is going to be quite off the wall, and probably laughed at by many, in some of the aspects of what it contains.

It's also following on from my posts entitled 'My thoughts on... The Bible', and 'I believe in' (section regarding UFO's added below)

Recently, there was a story on the news, about a suspected UFO hitting a wind turbine in Lincolnshire. I've attached the story here.




It brings forth the continuing arguement, is there life on other planets?

As stated in the 'I believe in' link above, I for one do believe that there is life on other planets. Here is my original entry from that link...

Area 51 - Life on other planets

How is it possible, that we, Earth, can sit in a Galaxy, surrounded by hundreds of thousands of other galaxies, and be the only planet out of millions that has life on it?

It's impossible!

Therefore, WE ARE NOT ALONE!

Have we had visitors? Have aliens visited our planet? Landed here? Of course they have!

Does Area 51 house secrets of these landings, and potentially alien life forms, crafts etc? Of course they do!

Are aliens living with us right now? Do they walk with us on this planet? Scary thought, but it could happen!

But to anyone who honestly believes we are alone, and that there cannot be life out there, you need your head examined!!!

Each of those dots is a Galaxy, and each Galaxy can house hundreds of planets and moons.

It's like looking at a green lawn and not expecting to see a single ant or creepy crawly. As if!

This moves into another theory, which I also believe in, in which we all came from another planet.

There have been theories for many years now, that we came from Mars, or some other such planet. And why not?

Who is to say, that we didn't originally live on Mars, and when Mars was being destroyed by our stupidity, already having sent probes to Earth, and discovering we could inhabit it, that we thought, stuff this, we've destroyed one planet, let's move to another one and start again?

It would account for the whole 'Adam & Eve' storyline, as people would have had to come over to start our race again.

Or....

Another planet sent various species to Earth, knowing from their own research how those species would grow and what they would evolve into etc, to start the evolution process, and have been watching over us for the last few billion years, to check out how we're progressing? Hence UFOs?

They may have chosen Mars originally, but it didn't work, (hence scientists finding subtle signs of possible previous life on Mars), so they tried Earth instead.

They could have easily planted the Bible into the pot as well, to try to get us to follow a set of moral rules. This follows on from my thoughts that the Bible is just fiction (see link above), and so they planted this fiction, as a storybook of their own creation, to persuade us to be good and follow a safe and moral code.

Obviously they were not counting on us creating different versions, and inevitably starting wars because of peoples' different beliefs, amongst other things. Or were they?

Makes you think, doesn't it?